FIND A LOCATION

  • EXCHANGE OFFICE

    WINNIPEG

    President: Jeff Ryzner

    100 – 321 McDermot Avenue
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 0A3 • P: 204-942-1493

    LEARN MORE CONTACT MAP
  • North Forge | South

    MORDEN

    Executive Director: Alison Lea

    500 Stephen Street
    Morden, Manitoba R6M 1T7 • P: 204-330-0292

    LEARN MORE CONTACT MAP
  • North Forge | East

    PINAWA

    President: Shane Li

    24 Aberdeen Avenue
    Pinawa, Manitoba R0E 1L0 • P: 204-262-6400

    LEARN MORE CONTACT MAP
  • Fabrication Lab

    WINNIPEG

    Vice-President: Marney Stapley

    3rd Floor, 125 Adelaide Street
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 0A3 • P: 204-799-2033

    LEARN MORE CONTACT MAP
  • SMARTPARK OFFICE

    WINNIPEG

    President: Jeff Ryzner

    200 – 135 Innovation Drive
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 6A8 • P: 204-262-6400

    LEARN MORE CONTACT MAP
SEE ALL

3D Printing Considerations for Production in Manufacturing

By Marney Stapley
North Forge Fabrication Lab Director

Advancements in Additive Manufacturing (AM, also known as 3D printing) increasingly enable companies to move beyond prototyping to end-product manufacturing. Here are some areas to consider:

Cost

According to Deloitte’s research, AM can compete with the cost of traditional manufacturing methods at levels of production up to approximately 14,000 parts. Most direct cost comparisons are done with injection molding (IM) and the production of relatively small plastic parts. 

The comparisons of the direct cost associated with AM and traditional manufacturing methods consistently point to tooling and machine costs as key differentiators. 

Tooling and its cost far outweighs the unit cost of each additional part. Beyond its production, tooling must be maintained, stored, and often tracked over long periods of time. 

Machine costs tend to take up the majority of the cost structures for AM. New product-capable 3D printers can be very expensive. Build volume is critical on these printers to fill out build volumes to sufficiently pack the production envelope. Materials costs can be about 30% higher with AM compared to traditional methods such as IM. Material recyclability drives cost as well. 

Speed to Market 

AM can be perceived as slow, particularly in the case of single-object builds. Remember that the parts being produced are “near net shape” in a single process and that all steps related to casting, machining, and other equivalent processing for more traditional approaches should be considered. 

Faster design iterations may accelerate time to market, and market responsiveness may also be improved through accelerated product modification and changeover due to reductions in tooling use.

In addition to improved responsiveness and cost savings, market risk may be reduced where an improved ability to make minor product adjustments results in greater market acceptance.

Greater value by designing for AM 

AM lets designers focus on supporting the intended function of an object rather than on its manufacturability. An example by Mark Cotteleer, Deloitte’s Research Director showed that in aerospace, AM can reduce component weight by 30-35% and eliminate up to 90% of material used. In a specific example, one aircraft manufacturer redesigned a generic bracket using AM. The resulting part was estimated to save 22 lbs per aircraft. 

Manufacturers should consider the implications of product redesign, with or without attempting supply chain changes, in order to truly understand where AM represents a viable production technology and where it does not. 

AM offers companies an opportunity to innovate. Here are a few areas to help evaluate the business case for AM:

  1. Begin with the focus on relatively small, complex, plastic parts. This is where the most substantial evidence exists for AM to outperform/by-pass the cost efficiency of more traditional manufacturing methods. 
  2. Tooling is fundamental and may shift towards AM due to its expense, flexibility, and impact on time to market. Even if traditional tooling is justified for large production runs, it may be feasible to deploy AM technology for product introduction, allowing tooling to be recycled or discarded rather than tracked and stored. 
  3. Material costs. Consider business cases where material costs can be dramatically reduced. In particular, evaluate circumstances where vendor-supplied materials may be required and where they may not. 
  4. Look at the financial implications of the capital cost of a new technology investment. Seek advice on leasing, depreciation and tax implications. 
  5. Have a wider perspective on time. Before deciding AM is slow, consider the full production cycle involved in traditional methods, including lag time between production steps. Also consider time to market and delivery lead times as a part of the value proposition. 
  6. Understand product innovation based on AM. Skilled designers may find ways to redesign components to reduce material used while maintaining or improving product performance. Redesign can help offset often higher AM material costs and add value for customers. AM technologies can help companies differentiate themselves by creating unique market offerings.
Share

Supporters

Bockstael logo

Bockstael

Share
LEARN MORE
Pinawa logo

LGD Pinawa

Share
LEARN MORE
CNL logo

Canadian Nuclear Laboratories

Share
LEARN MORE

Canadian National Energy Alliance

Share
LEARN MORE

North Forge Technology Exchange

Share
LEARN MORE

SEED - Altona

Share
LEARN MORE

Relish

Share
LEARN MORE

Portage Regional Economic Development

Share
LEARN MORE

Morden & District Chamber of Commerce

Share
LEARN MORE

Morden Community Development Corp

Share
LEARN MORE

Community Futures Heartland

Share
LEARN MORE

Carman

Share
LEARN MORE

Access Credit Union

Share
LEARN MORE

North Forge East

Share
LEARN MORE

Community Futures Winnipeg Rivers

Share
LEARN MORE

Business Development Bank of Canada

Share
LEARN MORE

Barkman Concrete Ltd.

Share
LEARN MORE

Pitblado Law

Share
LEARN MORE

Bit Space Development

Share
LEARN MORE

Pinawa Community Development Corporation

Share
LEARN MORE

Canadian Nuclear Laboratories

Share
LEARN MORE

Canadian National Energy Alliance

Share
LEARN MORE

Pegboard Hosting

Share
LEARN MORE

Western Economic Diversification Canada

Share
LEARN MORE

Government of Canada

Share
LEARN MORE

City of Winnipeg

Share
LEARN MORE

University of Manitoba

Share
LEARN MORE

MNP LLP

Share
LEARN MORE

Fabbaloo

Share
LEARN MORE

High Speed Crow

Share
LEARN MORE

GO Software

Share
LEARN MORE

Deloitte

Share
LEARN MORE

Red River College

Share
LEARN MORE

Princess Auto

Share
LEARN MORE

Bell MTS

Share
LEARN MORE

Thompson Dorfman Sweatman

Share
LEARN MORE

Relish New Brand Experience Inc.

Share
LEARN MORE

Stu Clark Centre for Entreprenuership

Share
LEARN MORE

Manitoba Government

Share
LEARN MORE

les.net

Share
LEARN MORE